Skip to content

Fire detection · Apollo Fire Detectors

The panel and the detector can come from two different houses.

A British detector manufacturer whose protocol many panels speak. That gives you freedom when choosing and creates a seam, and the second shows up the day an item behaves oddly. Here we tell you both.

What it is, and where it turns up.

Apollo Fire Detectors — Professional detectors and open protocols. In practice, this.

A detection system is two worlds: the panel —the cabinet that asks everything several times a second and decides— and the items hanging off the cable, which are the detectors, the call points, the sounders and the modules that command other things. This house makes the second, and it makes them to work with panels from many brands.

That is why it turns up in installations of every kind and often without the client having chosen it: offices, schools, hotels, care homes, retail, industry, public buildings. And it turns up in both worlds, that of zoned systems and that of addressable systems, where each item has its own address and the panel can say which one it was and what state it is in.

It also turns up where almost nobody else can go: atmospheres with an explosion risk. There are detector versions prepared for those zones, and that explains why you find it in fuel installations, in chemical plants and in paint booths.

How it is built, and what gets decided as it is.

The items hang off a loop that leaves the panel, runs round the building and comes back. If the cable is cut at one point, the panel gets there from the other side and loses nobody; and with isolators spread along the route, a short circuit eats one stretch instead of the whole floor. How many isolators and where is a design decision you cannot see and which shows up the day a screw touches where it should not.

On technology, the usual criteria: optical in offices, corridors, rooms and cabled ceiling voids; heat in kitchens, car parks and plant rooms; multi-criteria where you need sensitivity in a dirty atmosphere; flame outdoors and in very high units; aspirating when you have to know very early or the ceiling is at twelve metres; linear heat detection cable on conveyors and in tunnels.

Warning people is the other half: call points by the exits, sounders and beacons where there is noise or where there are people who cannot hear, and voice evacuation when you have to say which way out and not just that it is time to get out. And what never appears in the quotation: the batteries that give the runtime with no mains, calculated with the consumption of what is actually fitted and not with that of the original design.

The environment rules, and it can be adjusted.

A false alarm is not a nuisance: it finishes the system off, because by the third one somebody isolates the zone and the isolated zone is still drawn on the plan.

What this house brings on that ground is that the same detector takes several behaviour modes depending on where it goes: the same device can be more alert in a room and calmer in a draughty corridor. It works no miracles with a badly sited detector, but it solves the in-between cases, and there are many of those.

The cases that are not in between call for something else. The steam from a kitchen or a changing room, the dust in a warehouse, the smoke from welding, the exhaust of a forklift on the loading bay: there an optical detector is going to go off and the fix is changing the technology, not turning the sensitivity down until it copes. Turning it down is swapping a problem you can see for one you cannot.

And there is one scenario where this gets serious: zones with an explosion risk. There the detector not only has to detect, it has to not be a source of ignition, and that changes the equipment, the cabling and who can sign the installation off. If your building has a zone like that, it is the first thing to put on the table.

Freedom when choosing, and a seam.

The good side of a protocol many panels speak is real: you are not tied to one house for the items, and the day the head end has to be changed there is a serious chance of keeping the items and the cabling. That turns a project's budget into an upgrade's, and it has to be checked on the installation and item by item, not on a spreadsheet.

The seam is the other side. When the panel is from one house and the detector from another, odd behaviour turns into a conversation between two support teams who do not know each other, with the client in the middle. That is why whoever answers for the whole thing working has to be one single party, and it is whoever built the installation. We sign for it when we have built it ourselves; and when we come into somebody else's installation, the first thing is to say what we have checked and what we have not.

How far the work goes.

It gets said in the first meeting and not halfway through the works.

We are electronics people. Detection design, panel, loops, items, alarm, evacuation, interlocks with air conditioning, doors, lifts and access control, commissioning and maintenance: ours and complete. Water, no: sprinklers, fire hose reels, dry risers, pressure booster sets and tanks are another trade, with another licence and other trades involved, and we do not subcontract it to appear as though we do it.

Gas suppression is split, and in an installation with hazardous zones that line has to be perfectly clear. The detection, the panel that counts the time down before discharge, the do-not-enter warnings, the release button and the abort button and the interlock that stops the air conditioning and closes the dampers: electronics, and we do it. The cylinder bank, its fixings and its pipework, no. Knowing that early changes how many companies you have to ask for a price.

What we do with it.

And if there are hazardous zones, that gets settled before anything else.

  • The survey and the design: what is fitted, what can be kept, what technology each place calls for and which zones have changed use since the last time anybody looked.
  • The special zones first: explosion risk, very high ceilings, cold stores, outdoors. They are the ones that decide the design, and leaving them until the end is what blows a budget apart halfway through the works.
  • The table of what the building does with each zone, signed before any programming: what releases, what closes, what stops and who gets told.
  • The commissioning point by point, checking that the panel sees each item where it really is, with the complete sequence for each zone and a signed record sheet for each point.
  • The maintenance: a calendar of inspections and a file of what is done at each one. It gets paid for every year, and that is said before signing and not with the first invoice.

Who operates it afterwards.

The short answer: using the system, your people; touching the system, no.

Using it is silencing the sounders once you know what is happening, resetting the panel after checking, reading the history to know at what time and where it started, and understanding a fault warning without ringing anybody. Whoever is in the building every day has to be able to do that, and it is taught on the day of handover.

In between sits the temporary isolation of a zone under building works. It is taught, with its rule written down and its record of who isolates and who puts it back: the zone that was left out on a Friday afternoon is one of the most repeated holes there is, and the panel is warning about it on a screen nobody looks at.

Touching the system is not the client's, and not out of professional jealousy: adding or moving items, changing the programming or the sensitivities and updating the panel have to be in the hands of a licensed maintenance company, with its calendar and its signed file. And what decides whether your people can really operate it is the drawings of what is there, the one-page procedures and training by role.

What gets decided in the project, and where we say no

Get started

Have you got a zone where a normal detector won't do?

Tell us what goes on in there, how high it is and what is fitted today. With that we will tell you which technology is the right one, what can be kept of what is there and which part of the work is not ours.